I live in Memphis, Tennessee, a city which has many fine qualities but lacks a good school system. In fact, our system is widely acknowledged as among the worst in the United States. I have been thinking about our system a lot lately because the local Superintendent has accepted a position in Boston and the search for a replacement is in the news pretty frequently. We hear constantly about the usual symptoms of bad school systems (violence, drugs, hyper-sexuality, drop out rates, dismal test results, illiterate graduates, etc.) and wonder if anything can be done to improve the situation. I'm sure these problems are not unique to my community, in fact, I'm confident that these problems are fairly universal and that they are probably just slightly more pronounced here.
I believe that any significant change in the direction of our educational systems requires a much broader cultural change. After all, any institution as ubiquitous as public schools is a pretty accurate reflection of our society in general. I remembered recently a piece entitled Screwtape Proposes a Toast by C.S. Lewis that I read many years ago and I believe he has described the problem pretty clearly. Here's an excerpt:
The basic principle of the new education is to be that dunces and idlers must not be made to feel inferior to intelligent and industrious pupils. That would be “undemocratic.” These differences between pupils – for they are obviously and nakedly individual differences – must be disguised. This can be done at various levels. At universities, examinations must be framed so that nearly all the students get good marks. Entrance examinations must be framed so that all, or nearly all, citizens can go to universities, whether they have any power (or wish) to profit by higher education or not. At schools, the children who are too stupid or lazy to learn languages and mathematics and elementary science can be set to doing things that children used to do in their spare time. Let, them, for example, make mud pies and call it modelling. But all the time there must be no faintest hint that they are inferior to the children who are at work. Whatever nonsense they are engaged in must have – I believe the English already use the phrase – “parity of esteem.” An even more drastic scheme is not possible. Children who are fit to proceed to a higher class may be artificially kept back, because the others would get a trauma -- Beelzebub, what a useful word! – by being left behind. The bright pupil thus remains democratically fettered to his own age group throughout his school career, and a boy who would be capable of tackling Aeschylus or Dante sits listening to his coeval’s attempts to spell out A CAT SAT ON A MAT.
(Note that the speaker here is a fictitious character named Screwtape, a devil who is teaching other devils how to do as much damage as possible.)
I don't think we can put all the blame for our current problems on our current President because the notion of "no child left behind" was around way before he even entered the educational system. The real root of the problem is in twisted notions of equality that value "sameness" over excellence. While modern education appears to be a symptom of a deteriorating democracy, it also seems to be accellerating the decline of our society. I can't find anything in the U.S. Constitution that supports or even justifies the level of control that that our government has over education in our time. Public education is one of those things that we have grown up with and therefore believe that it was always so and always must be so. But if we look at our history a little closer, we can see that the notion of universal, compulsory, and tax payer funded education is a fairly modern one.
It sounds sophisticated, progressive, and even enlightened to say that education is the answer to societal problems but I believe there is a lot more evidence to show that what we call education ends up doing more harm than good. In my ideal world, education would be a service like any other in a free market. Competition and consumer choices would determine the price and levels of service available. I'll admit that this a fairly radical idea, but what we have now clearly isn't working very well.
What is your solution to the problem?
Recent Comments